Eaters of the Dead or what was re-titled The 13th Warrior came to theaters in 1999. Critics, particularly Roger Ebert, savaged it, but over the decades a cult following grew and many came to love this story that treated us to a good amount of butchery.

In cinema we are given a story about travelers, and bravery, the sons of weak lords, sword play, foul play and even cannibals and kings. On screen we get Norsemen and battle smoke, a terrible foe, brotherhood, jokes and its accompanying laughter, we even get a leader who gives an impressive speech to rise up, to be warriors and to defeat an unguessable foe. His kinsmen stand to serve a dying man of a dying breed. Men like Buliwyf tend to be honorable and rare indeed.

What’s not to like about a movie about heroes and cavemen? The movie with so much promise delivers many dislikes; audiences waited for an awesome buildup to what could have been a truly brutal and kinetic fight but the disjointed camera work was underwhelming indeed;  the director even experimented with hand held cameras for the final battle scene.

The subplot of clan politics is never explored yet this too had promise. Those who know that director McTiernan’s cut of the film conflicted with author Michael Crichton’s vision will forgive the movie for its small failures. In the end what makes the plotless movie so good is the viewer lends it value, because most men can relate to these kinds of simple tales and so too the ambition of these normal men grows on you.

A confluence of a couple of good elements make this thin film actually viewing worthy. It is a tale of a small band of brave men willing to investigate what brought devastation to a terrified people, even risking their own lives to obtain the answer. The biggest draw here is these men don’t have super powers and so we can relate to them. Many of the Norse men die. As Chesterton wrote, a courageous man needing to cut his way out from enemies surrounding him must, “combine a strong desire for living with a strange carelessness about dying.” “he must desire life like water, and yet drink death like wine.” Which reminds me of a funny moment in the movie when Ahmad Ibn Fadlan is told Meade is made from honey. Yes, the movie is sweet.

Follow our regular channel at Spotterup on YouTube 

Follow our WEBSITE

Follow on Instagram 

Follow on WeMe

Visit our STORE 

*The views and opinions expressed on this website are solely those of the original authors and contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of Spotter Up Magazine, the administrative staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.

 

By Michael Kurcina

Mike credits his early military training as the one thing that kept him disciplined through the many years. He currently provides his expertise as an adviser for an agency within the DoD. Michael Kurcina subscribes to the Spotter Up way of life. “I will either find a way or I will make one”.

2 thoughts on “The 13th Warrior Movie Review”
  1. A very nice review.
    As a practitioner of historical European martial arts, there are several moments in this movie that make me cringe. The main character being unable to hold up a Viking sword, which usually weighed around 2 pounds, the grinding down a Viking sword into a saber (physically impossible), the Viking leader wearing an armor chest plate armor that would not appear for several more centuries, men carrying swords on their back (only in Hollywood), etc. Yet, I too love this movie of a man who was not trained as a warrior but was forced into being one. I especially like the main character’s prayer at the end of the movie where he acknowledges to God his many life plans and his faults but asks only for forgiveness and to live the next few minutes well.

    Ran Pleasant

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.